All todays, A new theory about bats

"Bats are now considered within a group related to small insectivores, thanks to careful analysis, they were quadrupeds, some with strange leather trimmings (well preserved some remains of soft tissue).

However, it has begun to emerge a strange theory about its relationship to other mammals and appearance. One interested in this group has proposed several hypotheses from observations based on images of several specimens of each holotype found, and as such, it is likely that bats are not related to small mammals, it is considered that bats could be more ungulates and related macropods with any mammal, including said is probably belong to another three separate branch of mammals due to their unusual characteristics.

It has also made some new reconstructions based on this theory, exposing bats as bipedal animals, like the macropods, and rodents. The theme of the integument in mammals has caused considerable controversy, as only found some species, such as dogs, cats, rats, and partly in horses (long filaments that ran back, probably as a defense is found ). The one interested theory has suggested that this integument is also very present in bats. But on a larger scale. He has interpreted the integument could have been in such an amount that would probably have developed strange ornaments with skin folds. There are many other theories besides bats bipeds with lots of integument, is also found that whales are actually related to snakes, lizards are very primitive mammals, and birds have been ancestors of some amphibians.

Many have questioned this theory, for now, does not have many concrete evidence to defend it, and even no evidence that contradicts, however, remains"

Some might consider it as a satirical draw, of peters version, but not trying to be satirical, but rather to be demonstrative about what we can bring different interpretations in relation to reality