Dragonthunders on DeviantArthttps://www.deviantart.com/dragonthunders/art/Holocene-fauna-the-mystery-of-crocodile-skin-503864279Dragonthunders

Deviation Actions

Dragonthunders's avatar

Holocene fauna: the mystery of crocodile skin

Published:
7.9K Views

Description

Investigators and paleontologists have managed to make the most precise material available from reconstructions, because it has been linked with each species that are still living, giving a advantage of what could be their appearance. however, sometimes appear beings that due to a small, minuscule detail, and with little evidence, a polemic is created, about how they should be represented the animals. The crocodile is found around the world in different environments, characterized by its great jaws, capable of coping with some of the most dangerous mammals like hippos, dolphins and whales. undoubtedly they evolved almost convergent manner to cetaceans, as they have a morphology and dentition like. however, unlike the cetaceans, crocodiles still retain their hindlimbs.

initially thought that as cetaceans mammals, they had a similar lifestyle, but the discovery that most possessed a covering of bony plates that covered their backs, that theory was discarded because these plates would make them much heavier.

at first was related to monitor lizards, which luckily there are some descendants who are like living fossils. this gave a first idea about their appearance, placing it as a kind of scaly reptile large with the back covered by hard dermal plates, that perhaps gave a defense against predators like cats medium and large birds peaks. his mouth would be covered by a lip, what would have protected their teeth wear. The oldest reconstructions has lacked these, but after a while it began to spread this idea, until it was marked.

however, new meticulous analyzes have shattered the common belief, because the phylogenetic analysis show that crocodiles were more related to birds that monitor lizards. This has made me think about the likely appearance of these animals, and also its position on the evolutionary tree. this led to the conclusion that the crocodiles could have been a very primitive form of birds. With this discovery subsequent tegument in some types of birds, it has been suggested that these crocodiles being the most primitive bird forms, could have been coated plumage. new reconstructions have changed the look of this ferocious animal, it is believed that as many reptiles from the same age, as the iguana, may have had a considerable amount of plumage, which could have covered his body.

now everything is speculative, and until can be find fossils with skin impressions, is probably remain in the speculative
Image size
2500x2800px 1.88 MB
© 2014 - 2024 Dragonthunders
Comments47
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
Lucas-jorquera's avatar
I like the criticism you make about how we reconstruct extinct genres, but I do not understand what is being referred to. Is it a mockery of the feathered dinosaurs? and if so, why? I have never seen a deinosuchus or postosuchus with feathers reconstructed, if I have seen dinosauromorphs reconstructed in that way (although there is no evidence of this) reconstructing teropods such as coelophysis, dilophosaurus or limusaurus with feathers is not relative or outlandish, it makes a lot of sense the current evidence that plumage is an ancestral condition of both pterosaurs and dinosaurs, not to mention that we know that several groups lost their feathers in a secondary way (one of those groups could be the tyrannosaurids) maybe it is not so logical with teropods large such as allosaurus, acrocanthosaurus, spinosaurus or tyrannosaurus (perhaps due to size, weight or type of habitat) but if it is with small theropods. There is no problem, an example, we have evidence of scales in advanced ornithopods but not in basal members (dysalotosaurus, tenontosaurus, jinzhousaurus or zalmoxes) even so we rebuild them with scales (according to me, only should be reconstructed with feathers related to kulindadromeus , as thescelosaurus) the same with mammals of extinct families as the creodontos, not because there are no samples of hyaenodon, megistotherium or patriofelis hair, we are going to reconstruct them without hair. It's not an attack or anything, it's just a point of view, I'd like to know what you think.